A rare reversal on a company’s forced arbitration clause.

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not a lawyer so I have no clue about the legal issues, but I’m more than happy to put my name to anything that costs a corporation money. I don’t even need the money. They can take it out of Valve’s pocket and burn it for all I care.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Like, I don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but Valve has been the most consumer friendly corporation I’ve ever seen. Even if they do meet the criteria for a monopoly, they are the model of what a company that finds itself as The Monopoly should be, in my opinion.

      I have no intent to sign up for this “lawsuit”, even though I stand to gain some $500 from it. I hope Steam lives long and prospers.

    • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Great, you should focus your efforts on different companies, Valve is one of the few good ones (for now).