hydroptic to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agoWho's rule?imagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down115
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageWho's rule?hydroptic to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaretoynbee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoNot sure “neat” is the word I’d use. Its existence doesn’t upset me, but I wouldn’t mind if it didn’t exist.
minus-squareBuglefingers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoNeat in the macabre sense. Because while it’s disturbing for sure, it’s interesting someone put that much effort into production effort of such a thing.
Not sure “neat” is the word I’d use. Its existence doesn’t upset me, but I wouldn’t mind if it didn’t exist.
Neat in the macabre sense. Because while it’s disturbing for sure, it’s interesting someone put that much effort into production effort of such a thing.
Well, hard to argue with that.