tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前I like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.netimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1521arrow-down176
arrow-up1445arrow-down1imageI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square168fedilink
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.
So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
Removed by mod
But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
Removed by mod
Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.