I’m fully just calling the “gender affirming care bans” what they are, bans on trans minors, because somebody on the main subReddit pointed out that the child brides in all of these red states do not have restrictions on ‘their’ boob jobs.

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Well the whole “minors” thing is a little overblown. There is one surgery available for 16 year olds with parental consent covered for trans affirming care. Top surgery.

    Every other surgery is only available when a person is basically voting age and can make their informed decision as a legal adult.

    All in all the surgery is basically aesthetically reversable via silicone implants and formula exists for anybody who has trouble lactating for any reason so it is pretty low risk all told.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Nope. Just boobs. Bottom surgery is actually all told not a super popular option since it has a long recovery process. Only about 14% of people who identiffy as trans actually go in for it.

        There’s a bit of a risk reward calculation to make regarding how the options turn out and a lot of us compromise based on other life factors. It really is a very personal process and the general conception of transitions following a checklist to full surgically isn’t an accurate representation in the slightest. Most transitions are sort of composites of social engineering techniques combined with psychological practices of avoiding triggers. If you can get by without a surgery generally speaking you do.

      • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        That kind of surgery being performed on minors is rare and the individual must meet a very high criteria before any surgeon would actually perform it.