Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1671arrow-down19cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@derp.foointernet@kbin.socialprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1662arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@derp.foointernet@kbin.socialprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squareshalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0