The only alternatives mentioned were Threads and Bluesky.

    • CMLVI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 个月前

      That’s…actually a cool AF idea/inplementation of Fediverse shit. A practical use as well, as they’d control who was on the instance and would be a sorta pseudo-verification process for any accounts on it’s own.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        4 个月前

        I think it’s perfect for governments. You can subscribe anywhere, you know it’s legit, and that’s a much better way to do notifications than twitter.

        • CMLVI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 个月前

          Yeah I’m not entirely well-versed in the implications of what that would allow, but it’s another use-case that would be cool to see!

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 个月前

      Yeah, but then again, do you want a government controlled social media? 🤔

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        4 个月前

        The government could control social media on their own instance, sure.

        I think having government accounts come from an official instance would garner more trust in the platform.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 个月前

        It’s not… it’s the fediverse. I’m completely fine with them having their own instance, it’s not like they control it by any means. Hell they can be defederated. It’s a lot better than them choosing some random instance.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 个月前

        I think the distributed nature of Mastodon keeps government control from being an issue. It would be kind of cool as a space for citizens to ask for assistance or air grievances while giving the politicians an officially owned space for things like announcements.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 个月前

          Totally agree. The issues with “government-controlled social media” are a non-issue in a federated environment, and the URL would give them legitimacy.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        I don’t want a private company controlling government email servers, why would I want them to control government social media platforms?

      • electricprism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        What you don’t like pot holes in your roads? XD We can easily host our own server where the database password is already 123456