• nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    4 months ago

    They fail gloriously at at that too.

    Whenever they get tested the red teams manage to smuggle in everything needed to hijiack a plane plus a kitchen sink.

    The few times that terrorists tried to board planes, they made it through security and were caught by other passengers.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s what’s changed. Before, a hijacking meant a free trip to south America or Cuba. Now it means you’re likely to die if you don’t stop the hijackers. A planeful of pissed off passengers determined to live are gonna stop a would-be hijacker.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Rigidly hierarchical control structures always carry the implicit assumption that those at the top are the good guys. (That is if they’re being sold as a way to ensure good)

          The common trope about “if you don’t have anything to hide why have privacy?” is overturned by challenging that assumption. Sometimes the guys doing the surveillance turn bad and then it’s a worse situation than if there wasn’t total surveillance.