• Thalamus@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess for clinical use it doesn’t really matter? As long as there’s an effect on clinical endpoints.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, I just don’t like it when we invest huge sums on research based purely on clinical results. Better than models that don’t show efficacy in clinical trials, but still, magic drugs always bother me.

      • Thalamus@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I get it. The companies developing these drugs or funding the research probably don’t care about fundamental knowledge. Even in pure academia people would probably rather have some publishable results than actual insight in a disease.

        If they did, there could’ve been some psychiatric diseases that were actually understood as well.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, also read the abstract, it’s positive, but there are definite questions, the increase in ventricular volume was odd for one.

          I just think we haven’t quite nailed the cause down yet, even if we’re close, there’s a wrinkle and trying to treat things we “almost understand” is risky (you can ‘cure’ some forms of mental illness with a lobotomy, but that’s not the point).