As much as I don’t like Harris, I’m thrilled I was wrong about her chances against Trump
I was in the not Harris camp too. But she blasted out the gate incredibly strong, I’m impressed.
she started out very weak for me when she held that in person meeting with netanyahu to confirm continued support for the genocide; but then she issued a statements the next day calling for it to end; so it’s looking promising.
i wish she did something more than cheap words to help me convince myself to vote for her.
I’m not a single issue voter, so that doesn’t make or break anyone for me.
I’m curious, what do you think of Trumps approach to Israel’s genocide? Is their plan better?
people are unjustly losing their lives due to a fascist regime; it doesn’t matter which facist regime is doing it.
‘Kamala didn’t rebuke genocide strongly enough, so I’ll support the candidate that unabashedly supports and encourages genocide!’
That is my understanding of your view based on the last two comments. Good luck with stopping the murder spree that way
Edit: I’m all for better options. It’s just quite disingenuous to say you won’t vote for the only candidate that’s rebuffed Israel over the genocide when the competition is actively supporting it.
Come on. You really think people are buying your shit?
How would you define “fascist regime”?
cyka blyat at least try to make it make sense comrade
Shut the fuck up
Removed by mod
Well, AOC plays the game quite well. I agreed with her that it was too late to switch.
To be clear, I’m an independent conservative that doesn’t like Biden or Harris. But you can count me to vote against Trump and is ilk (people who don’t see certain groups as people, people who deny science).
Republicans may be tolerable at a local level — especially because I live in a conservative county. But there is no way in hell I can trust Republicans not to cave to party leadership
Removed by mod
You should get off your high horse before it becomes impossible. I still absolutely believe Biden could have and probably would’ve won, but I will admit that I was wrong that him dropping out ended up being good rather than bad.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Are those people going to vote for Trump instead?
Just not Shapiro. Kelly is at least an astronaut and that is still one of the few things people are in awe about.
The way Pete’s been running around doing interviews I think it’ll be him.
she needs a popular straight white cis-gendered outwardly protestant christian guy to win; like obama did.
… So she will pick Biden? /s
I didn’t know, I think the fact she’s doing this in PA might mean that Shapiro got the nod.
Seems kind of insulting to hold the announcement in the state of one of the contenders and not choose them. I suppose it could signal that even though she didn’t choose Shapiro it doesn’t mean they don’t prioritize PA. Feels like a stretch though.
A more mundane reason for the location (if it’s not Shapiro) is that this is going so fast they don’t have the ability to change Harris’s plans for a symbolic reveal. It’s entirely likely these things were already in motion before a decision was even made. They just don’t have the time to change which state they start their tour in.
The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: The Guardian Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.Footer
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.Interesting! I’d have thought the guardian to be one of the most reputable.
Removed by mod
What’s your critique of the Dem Tuesday VP announcement?
