Is this the vegan utopia we’ve been dreading? You don’t win friends with salad

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, cargo ships burn bunker fuel with impunity.

    Stop trying to pin responsibility for global warming on the little people. The rich created this disaster, and the rich are the only ones who can turn it around.

    Unfortunately, they’d rather build themselves opulent underground shelters where they’ll hang out while the rest of humanity dies.

    We’re screwed, there’s nothing we can do to save ourselves, and we may as well live it up and hope we check out before it gets really ugly.

    • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whilst generally I agree with you, I disagree with this defeatist mindset when it comes to eating meat.

      I think you’re underestimating how big an impact the meat industry has on the climate, and you’re underestimating the power “regular people” have with regards to eating less.

      The meat industry exists because we eat loads of it. If we eat less of it, the meat industry will become smaller as a capitalistic reaction.

      And no, I’m not a vegan. I eat meat every day because (and this is not a valid excuse) I’m a bodybuilder and eating loads of chicken every day is an easy way to get protein. That said, I do believe that 200 years from now society will look back at our consumption of real meat as barbaric. Synthesised lab-grown meat will happen eventually, and sadly it’ll probably take that for society as a whole to change. Hopefully humanity will survive to see the day!

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think you’re underestimating how big an impact the meat industry has on the climate, and you’re underestimating the power “regular people” have with regards to eating less.

        The meat industry exists because we eat loads of it. If we eat less of it, the meat industry will become smaller as a capitalistic reaction.

        That would only delay the end of the world, not prevent it. It would be a huge and mostly senseless sacrifice.

        Synthesised lab-grown meat will happen eventually

        That seems highly unlikely. Synthetic meat was successfully made a decade ago, and then it disappeared from public view without a trace. It appears to have been a PR stunt, not a viable technology.

        • YungOnions@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That defeatist attitude benefits no one except the status quo. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Any positive change is better than none.

        • mackwinston@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What huge sacrifice?

          We eat far too much meat, and the huge overconsumption of meat is not only very bad land use, it’s very bad for us personally, leading to chronic illnesses in later life.

          I’m not vegan, I’m not even a vegetarian, but I’ve massively reduced meat intake of all kinds (and very very rarely touch red meat these days). I don’t even miss it, and I don’t count it as a sacrifice. I have discovered all sorts of plant based foods which are to be honest better than meat, so it’s a “negative sacrifice” - not only is my health improved, my food is more enjoyable, too.

          The expectation to have meat every single meal is frankly ludicrous.

    • borstis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the article, food production is responsible for a third of global greenhouse gas emission. And a rich person doesn’t eat that much more than a regular person. Except they probably eat more meat.

      So, yeah, reducing the amount of meat you eat can really help!

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Rampant consumerism” isn’t the problem. Lack of meaningful alternatives is the problem. Everything is made overseas, and everyone is too broke to afford locally-made products even if they did exist. Back in the day when computers were made in the USA, for example, you’d easily pay the equivalent of $8000 for one.

        • crystal@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re saying that you are not willing to pay the price for products made in climate and worker friendly conditions.

          Most people aren’t and since “the little people” want harmful products, companies produce harmful products.

          It is “the little people”'s fault. The corporations would offer climate and worker friendly products, if people bought them.

          But the little people choose not to.

          • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ll go ahead and repeat myself, since you seem to have missed a crucial part of my previous comment:

            everyone is too broke to afford locally-made products even if they did exist.

            • crystal@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You do realize products somewhere else aren’t magically cheaper? That the transport actually adds to the cost?

              The reason these products are cheaper is because you rely to abusing others.

              And no, abuse of others is not necessary. But yes, you would not be able to live as decadent of a lifestyle if you had to have even close to as little wealth as the people whose poverty you abuse.

              • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Decadent lifestyle? Is that some kind of joke? Who the hell is leading a decadent lifestyle in this economy? I’m lucky to even have a roof over my head, and the streets are crawling with homeless people who were only slightly less lucky!

                Direct your complaints to the rich people who created the problem and have the power to solve it. Blaming me for circumstances far outside my control is useless.

                • crystal@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Decadent lifestile compared to the people whose products you buy because you “can’t afford” to pay people in your own country.

                  Guess why products produced in your own country cost so much? Because the workers there get paid lots of money (when compared to the rest of the world).

                  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You continue to insist on blaming the systematic impoverishment and exploitation of the working class upon members of that same class, instead of the actual perpetrators. I am forced to assume that this is intentional, and that you are trying to sow division and infighting among the working class.

                    If my assessment of your intentions is correct, shame on you. If not, you should think long and hard about what you did to create that impression, and what you can do differently in the future.

                    Either way, this will be the last time I speak to you.

    • thepixelfox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And China contributes around 32% toward it too. But China isn’t gonna listen and just keep doing their bullshit and ruining lives and the environment.

      • TheDeadGuy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are experiencing record heatwaves so it might be getting their attention. Their population is huge so if they become uncomfortable it’s a powerful force for change

      • crystal@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The CO2 per capita produced in China is significantly less than the CO2 per capita produced in most first world countries.

        Even if an average first world person decides to eat no meat at all, they’re still gonna cause more CO2 emission than an average chinese person.

        This isn’t to be blamed on China.

        • thepixelfox@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          While countries with higher per-capita emissions have work to do, China’s raw pollution is absolutely an issue.