ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoMissouri high court blocks release of man whose conviction was overturned.www.voanews.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1303arrow-down17
arrow-up1296arrow-down1external-linkMissouri high court blocks release of man whose conviction was overturned.www.voanews.comModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoThis post is all over the place? They are “blocking the release”, but a judge did overturn the conviction? I haven’t clicked the link yet before getting confused, but I feel like this post is giving mixed signals.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoThey’re appealing the ruling. And so they want to keep him in prison until that’s done. Which is ridiculous.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoThey’re going to get their asses sued into oblivion. The problem is “their asses” is actually “the taxpayers” because these ghouls won’t be personally liable.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoAh, okay. Now I’m back on track. Thank you.
This post is all over the place?
They are “blocking the release”, but a judge did overturn the conviction?
I haven’t clicked the link yet before getting confused, but I feel like this post is giving mixed signals.
They’re appealing the ruling. And so they want to keep him in prison until that’s done. Which is ridiculous.
They’re going to get their asses sued into oblivion. The problem is “their asses” is actually “the taxpayers” because these ghouls won’t be personally liable.
Ah, okay. Now I’m back on track. Thank you.