The northern Italian city of Padua has started removing the names of non-biological gay mothers from their children’s birth certificates under new legislation passed by the “traditional family-first” government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

  • Amilo159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article “Surrogacy is illegal in Italy, and gay marriage has not been legalized. Because same-sex relationships aren’t recognized in law, the non-biological parent has to make a special case for legally adopting their child.”

    Makes sense, local government is simply following the law.

        • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who probably would have had to deal with a decade of abuse and neglect as a child if such a change had happened in Texas 20 years ago, I can prefer confidently say yes, it is monstrous.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who would be abusing you for your birth parents being on your birth certificate? The only people who see that document are the people raising you and the DMV/Passport office.

            • Unaware7013@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              …do you not understand how an abusive parent being on the birth certificate would have legal and custody implications?

              That’s not something that only the DMV/passport office sees, family judges see and may use that to determine custody arrangements, which can lead to abuse. I’m not sure how you managed to ignore the biggest and most obvious implications of changing parentage on the birth certificate.

              • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                …do you not understand how an abusive parent being on the birth certificate would have legal and custody implications?

                One’s adoptive parents have full custody, that is the point of adoption.

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s unfortunate that this community just mass downvotes anyone percieved as going against the approved narrative, even if it’s literally just stating facts.

        • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what it said. It said it only allows biological parents and that adoption by same sex parents requires special permission. Please don’t change the argument until something else.

    • Beto@lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You realize most atrocities in history were done “just following the law”, right?

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Makes sense, local government is simply following the law.

      … is what a fascist sympathizer would say in this situation.