Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) Friday, requesting that an ethics watchdog “immediately” initiate a review of Greene’s conduct after she …

  • Veraxus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another day, another crime - another felony - brazenly committed by a Republican. And she’ll probably get away with it, because laws and ethics are for plebes and “libs”.

    • experbia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The justice system is reticent to dole out consequences to conservatives because they know that each time they do, there is a fair probability of an uptick in domestic terrorism. We literally let the terrorists win. If we apply the law equally to fascists as we do to the rest of us, they will kill people with no remorse.

      Y’all Qaeda is intellectually incapable of differentiating between terrorism and normal protest. This is why they view “left wing” protests about systemic issues as city-razing terrorist attacks that need the military dispatched with blanket kill orders. This is why they don’t equate their club shooting, truck crowd-plowing, armed home-invader, electrical substation gunner terrorist friends as being a problem - because theyre just “protesting” like the left. The left is “already doing it” so they can too.

      The actual word “terrorist”, to them, is a word that means one thing: a filthy middle easterner who wants to blow up buildings to go to a virgin-filled afterlife. There’s absolutely no mental space for them to consider their fellow conservatives in the same group or to accept the actual definition.

      This is so dangerous. We’re already in a trap, even if we turn around now, it hurts a lot. The smart greedy opportunists flock loudly and publicly to conservatism now because they see that they can break the law and get away with it, because of this implied immunity-via-terrorism that may befall us if accountability comes for them in the public eye. But we need to turn around and pull out, because if we get fully trapped, we’re all done for good.

      • Flag@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didnt she repeat the act afterwards tho? Outsode of the legal walls of congress?

        • wagesj45@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now that I don’t know. If so, then I suspect she’d no longer be covered, unless a court were to interpret speech pertaining to her role as congressperson anywhere to be the same as “in either house”. I could see a good faith argument for it, but if Judge Wagesj45 was on the case, I don’t think I’d rule in their favor.