Two Ministry of Justice workers are in hot water for describing a researcher as a “bitch” in an online conversation.

Academic and author Barbara Sumner made a number of Official Information Act requests as part of her PhD research into the systems around adoption. Then, in October last year, she asked for all correspondence mentioning her by name.

“Because I had felt all along that there was a resistance to everything I sent in and you know, just the sort of snottiness, I guess, of some of the responses that came in that request. I wanted to understand how they were treating me throughout the process.”

One page of the response stood out among more than 100 others. A November 2022 Teams conversation between two staffers, whose names were redacted, complained about Sumner’s latest request.

They described it as “a waste of time” and said it “should have been refused on the ground of substantial collation” or that the ministry should “charge her for it and get a contractor”.

“our ministerial services team sucks cuz they wouldnt let us refuse, and helen didnt push back hard [sic],” one worker wrote.

"but also shes a bitch for wanting everything. does she think govt just has unlimited resources for this type of crap lol.

“like theres no public interest in our emails back and forward.”

  • Dave@lemmy.nzOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    and her current research seems to be about the web of lies and ommissions surrounding historical closed adoptions.

    Wow, I didn’t see this in the article but that provides some much needed context!

    OTOH as an ex journo she knows talking to the media about this will create a bit of buzz around her forthcoming research.

    Yeah this is probably what’s happening here. With the above context I can definitely see why she made the request. It was dumb for the staff to put that in writing, but I don’t think they should lose their job over it. Her making such a big deal seemed on the surface to be just someone making a big deal, but you’re probably right that as an author and ex journalist she is probably trying to get in the media to build some buzz and recognition for when her research is released.

    • liv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It got me interested in her other work! Turns out I’ve actually seen one of her documentaries, it’s this thing about a Maori family who breed horses in the Ruakines, plays on Maori TV sometimes.

      Relevant to OP article though, found this in a review of her book:

      As she tells her story, she very clearly identifies the cause of the suffering of those involved in adoption, the archaic 1955 Adoption Act. A policy formed on an ideology that total disconnection between adopted children and their biological parents was essential.

      “In all, I had over seventy interactions with government departments. The result was always the same. Yes, they had my files. Yes, any staff member could read those files. But no, I had no right to them.”

      If that was her experience, then going forward, feeling like you were being obstructed in an OIA process would reopen a few old wounds. Especially when now here she is at uni and trying to undertake academic research.

      I think many people don’t realise these days how bad adoption in NZ was, you sort of have to hear about it from the old timers. Teenage"unmarried mothers" were taken to special facilities and when they gave birth their babies were taken, even against their will/without consent in some cases, and never allowed to know who their parents were or why they were adopted or even what their own ethnicity was.

      • Dave@lemmy.nzOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It got me interested in her other work!

        No, that’s what she’s trying to make you do!

        Sorry, gotta break up the seriousness. Back to serious face.

        I’ve got some limited knowledge on adoption stuff, and yeah, some pretty awful processes. I’m tempted to say it was a different time, but I’m pretty convinced we* will find out in 50 years about terrible things happening today that would horrify future generations and probably horrify current generations.

        * Well maybe not us specifically, 50 years is a long time in the future

        • liv@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, that’s what she’s trying to make you do!

          I mean I mentioned it because it’s working on me!

          Wait why aren’t you going to be around in 50 years? Live to 100 go on I dare you.

          • Dave@lemmy.nzOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I have no desire to live to 100! But maybe now I know about anticholinergic burden I might be able to be a sprightly 100 year old.

            • liv@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I used to know a sprightly 100 year old who still lived alone in their own home. Their longevity advice was “don’t eat too many takeaways”! Bet they had a low anticholinergic burden though 😃

              • Dave@lemmy.nzOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’ve got to be careful with single data points. There are also 100 years olds saying the secret to longevity is a whiskey before breakfast, and a pack of cigarettes a day to keep the bugs away.

                • liv@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yeah I’m not going to let it get between me and takeaways ha ha.

                  Seriously though as well as being a single data point it was self-reported and I noticed it changed depending on the interlocuter - from memory they told the local paper that the secret is going to church.

                  • Dave@lemmy.nzOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I’m pretty sure the real secret behind living a really long time is some combination of genetics and statistics (as in, if you have a 0.0001% chance of living that long, if you apply this to 8B people then you get 8,000 of these people).