jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up1390arrow-down15cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1385arrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square144fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squaressladam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·5 months agoSaw the title, figured it couldn’t be that bad. Read the article. It is that bad.
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·5 months agoThen they at the end they give that know an extra twist by specifically mentioning two justices notorious for receiving substantial bribes rewards who didn’t feel the need to recuse themselves.
minus-squareChillPenguin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoThat’s exactly what I did too. I was like “they’ve gotta be exaggerating.” Nope, not at all. Ffs
Saw the title, figured it couldn’t be that bad. Read the article. It is that bad.
Then they at the end they give that know an extra twist by specifically mentioning two justices notorious for receiving substantial
bribesrewards who didn’t feel the need to recuse themselves.That’s exactly what I did too. I was like “they’ve gotta be exaggerating.” Nope, not at all. Ffs