• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shit, y’all could’ve saved a ton of time and effort if you’d have just asked me; I’ve been saying this for years. And it’s only worse when you’re the one speck of blue in a red sea.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s one of those things that are obvious to reasonable people but it’s nice to have proof for when you run into unreasonable people who deny it.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      i love getting scolded about voting when even if I personally managed to pull off a miracle and convert one thousand people to vote for biden, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        jUsT VoTE!!1!!11

        As if voting for president makes any difference, when it’s the electoral college who makes the final decision. And they’ve proven in the past that they’ll do what they want.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s been trending for some time. Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” describes a host of national policies that were intensely disliked when they began and only became normalized after years of mass media manipulation.

      The Drug Wars, opposition to the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, most of our wars after WW2, our large scale claw backs of social spending and ballooning security state budgets, our habit of subsidizing sports stadiums and toxic waste sites, etc - all need regular continued media investment for fear of a popular turn.

      SCOTUS widened the spigots for political spending in pursuit of these goals. But it’s not like the WSJ or AM Radio or the cable news companies weren’t already flush with propaganda before the CU decision. It’s not like CU was necessary for the volume of social media manipulation, either.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No the decisions weren’t necessary for all that, but for the one simple graph tracking campaign costs it was particularly salient.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember watching this nearly 6 years after release and how relevant it still was. It still is relevant. End Citizens United if you want to even begin to take our country back.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Is this the 20 year old study being pulled out for 2024 election cycle?

    PS 10 years

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Quality of life getting better, people around me buying houses and having children…

        Not

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          People around you are buying houses??? You mean like real people, and not chinese puppet companies who buy entire cities in an attempt to artificially inflate rent prices?

          • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Houses in my neighborhood are selling as soon as they hit the market, and yes, my neighbors are real people and are actually the homeowners. The family that just moved in next door are immigrants, the wife is a manager at a logistics center and her husband works nights at the local Amazon warehouse.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Wait…you live in an area where people own their own homes, and talk to their neighbors???

              My neighbor moved in 15 years ago. I had no idea until 6 years ago. Still haven’t talked to him, or know his name. I just know sometimes he wears green shirts.

              I hope he has family and loved ones. If he got hit by a bus, I’d hate for his obituary to read

              “He was a quiet neighbor, who sometimes wore green shirts. One time he had a dog, but I think he was just dog watching for a friend. Beautiful dog though. Golden retriever, healthy full coat of fur.”

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I just know sometimes he wears green shirts

                That’s Dave. I’d steer clear unless you’re into Warhammer 40k

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thank you for the precise info.

        I was being hyperbolic no doubt. But point still stands tho lol

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Duh? We know already know this. Their main concern is staying in office for as long as possible and see how badly they can fuck up the country.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Duh? We know already know this. Their main concern is staying in office for as long as possible and see how badly they can fuck up the country. much they can grow their own bank accounts.

      The destruction of the country is just a byproduct of their greed. :(

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Each congressperson represents too many people.

    We need to add seats to the House of Representatives.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I did, and the primary to. Then the people who I voted alongside of talked massive shit about me because I didn’t smile hard enough while voting for “the most pro-labor president”.

      Then they didn’t do anything to fix the First Past the Post voting system and the spoiler effect that comes along side it. Despite lecturing people over and over about its mathematical flaws whenever anyone mentioned voting outside the two party system.

      I will vote for your blue conservatives, but don’t try to fool me that I am represented with things as they are.

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      For what, exactly? The parties choose who we’re allowed to vote for. Until we abolish FPTP and implement RCV, there will be no democracy in America.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    And a lot of this comes from not fucking voting. I seriously wonder how things would be if voting was mandatory and everyone was given appropriate time off to do it.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      In Germany we only vote on Sundays and it’s super easy, barely an inconvenience. We’re still lucky when more than two thirds vote. People are in general are lazy and stupid.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      as long as they vote along party lines more than according to what the politicians do, number of votes does not improve this.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately, I think it’s exactly the opposite. They don’t have to do anything that people want to vote for them anyway.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          People on this website are understandably losing their minds because we’ve let this type of politics fester so much that the stakes are genuinely high this election cycle. But the stakes are only so high because we keep attempting the same thing over and over again. At this point, I’m not even advocating for a third party. I just want Democrats to do better instead of being less crappy than the other guys.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sorry but mandatory vote solves nothing. You’ll still have a lot of people alienate about politics and now they had to vote and they’ll make their choices like a popularity contest.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        mandatory vote solves nothing

        It theoretically solves structural disenfranchisement, as a mandate to vote is implicitly a mandate to allow people to vote.

        In practice, though? States can still layer on all sorts of Jim Crow shit to screen out the lower classes again.

    • eatthecake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That would be Australia. We are less extreme than the US but still succumb to fear tactics. We did manage to get marriage equality despite a conservative government so there’s that.

  • poorlytunedAstring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I understand that this is a doomer sub but man. When you manage to get away from all this social media bullshit for a while then try to poke your head in you realize how relentlessly negative it is at all times, because nobody wants to actually do anything about anything, including go the fuck outside and forget about it for a bit, and everyone with any ambitions of sanity leaves.

    Could we start discussing credible strategies to reverse this situation, or at least improve that number somehow? Absolutely the fuck not, never, ever ever. The shit is very literally crazy, I don’t know what I was trying to expect.

    But this post is so much like the other posts on the rest of the site it took me a minute to notice where I was. Might as well stop acting like this is just one community, it’s everything.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Could we start discussing credible strategies to reverse this situation, or at least improve that number somehow?

      I say this constantly, and everyone nods along happily when I say it, but almost nobody does it. What is it? It’s getting involved in your local politics.

      The federal government, the US congress and senate and all the executive branch… they’re all supported and propped up by powerful institutions within the states that got powerful because nobody paid it any attention and still don’t. People get elected to represent us who run without opposition and then we wonder why nothing seems to change.

      If you get involved with knowing who in your neighborhood, your school district, your city, your county and your state represent you, and then challenging that representation in any way you can, from actually running all the way to just getting on those horrible neighborhood forums and holding yard-sales to get to know your neighbors.

      GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS. Jesus, this country is terrible about this one huge thing that could change everything, which is reforming communities. We scream and cry how bad the world is and make ZERO effort to make it better by forming support systems within neighborhoods. I mean fuck, most suburban neighborhoods have nothing else to do, might as well have some bake sales and yard sales and jogging groups and other things to help get to know each other, right? Or has all our cynicism completely overshadowed any possible chance of ever forming friendly communities in the US?

      • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS.

        I move every year because my rent keeps going up and I can’t afford to stay. In some places ive been they offer a discount the first year then it goes up to the “normal rate”.

        Sorry to my MAGA neighbor that broke my headlight, I can’t afford to stay and educate you.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This study is bunk.

    Researchers critiquing the paper found that middle-income Americans and rich Americans actually agree on an overwhelming majority of topics. Out of the 1,779 bills in the Gilens/Page data set, majorities of the rich and middle class agree on 1,594; there are 616 bills both groups oppose and 978 bills both groups favor. That means the groups agree on 89.6 percent of bills.

    That leaves only 185 bills on which the rich and the middle class disagree, and even there the disagreements are small. On average, the groups’ opinion gaps on the 185 bills is 10.9 percentage points; so, say, 45 percent of the middle class might support a bill while 55.9 percent of the rich support it.

    Bashir and Branham/Soroka/Wlezien find that on these 185 bills, the rich got their preferred outcome 53 percent of the time and the middle class got what they wanted 47 percent of the time.

    https://www.vox.com/2016/5/9/11502464/gilens-page-oligarchy-study

    Inb4 10 downvotes and 0 replies.

    • Nimrod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the fact that there are ~40% of bills that both rich and middle class Americans oppose is pretty solid proof that congress doesn’t give a shit about what American citizens want them to pass… or am i misinterpreting this?

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Also, why the focus on rich and middle class? Is the vast majority of america not “lower”/working class? Edit: it seems like the entire conclusion of the study is based on the influence that money has in politics.

        One thing that does have an influence? Money. While the opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America have a “statistically non-significant impact,” economic elites, business interests, and people who can afford lobbyists still carry major influence.

        Of course if you focus only on people with money then you will come up with a conflicting result… so yeah. I also feel like I am missing something here.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      the rich got their preferred outcome 53 percent of the time and the middle class got what they wanted 47 percent of the time.

      Okay, but there’s a large third traunch of voters you’re neglecting

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Y’all should check out Doug Ford and the Ontario Science center shit show if you like this type of story.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    yeah no fucking shit, can we stop pretending this system is effective or worth defending?

    A Congressman is a hog! You must take a stick and hit him on the snout!

    - Henry Adams, 1906