I come from Reddit and been enjoying Lemmy so far. How is Lemmy dealing with multiple communities on the same topic? To me:

  • If the communities are all active, then I shall subscribe to all of them, but end up having lots of duplicate/similar posts on my feed
  • If there is one community that is dominating, then what is the point of federation?

I was subscribed to android@lemmy.world, and just because I actively went into it, I saw a post that the community was frozen and they decided to use another android community on a different server, to avoid fragmentation.

  • habanhero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you are missing the point of Lemmy if you think it’s “too decentralized”. Too many Reddit refugees are eager to bend Lemmy into some kind of Reddit-shaped clone and failed to realize the differences are mostly intentional.

    I actually think that multiple communities about the same topic isn’t as big of an issue as most people make it out to be. If two “competing” communities grows to be large enough you will eventually get the similar content and it doesn’t really matter which one you sub to, unless of course if one is “toxic” then the choice is clear. And you can always sub to both.

    • Lith@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit also had this exact same issue. For every r/flashlight you’d have a r/flashlights, r/realflashlight, r/flashlight2, r/torches, r/handbright, etc. Then you’d even have niche subsubreddits like r/flashlightslightingupdarkrooms. I never really considered this a problem because I like having different options available to me. I never really see the same thing posted enough times for it to be a problem, so usually it’s just twice as much content to subscribe to both, which I’m happy with. I wouldn’t really consider communities to be competing with each other, and the redundancy is actually really nice as a user. You’re free to only subscribe to the community you like more if you really want to limit your subscriptions for some reason.

      • HipPriest@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whenever someone brings this up, which seems to be daily, I just think of the amount of different subs I was on Reddit for for the same or similar things and think well it’s not really that different. There were always several for reading, history etc and the same is true here so…

        You can just do a quick check to see the most active group and join that one if you really just want the one which I sometimes do. Or just join loads and see which ones are best which I also sometimes do… It’s all part of the fun for me but it really seems to bug some people

    • JGWentworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, there was a whole conversation beneath my comment and neither lemmy.world nor the Jerboa app gave me any kind of indication that someone had replied to me. God, Lemmy fucking sucks.

    • hutchmcnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree with you, but I think it would be cool if communities could federate too. If I’m subscribed to baseball@lemmy.world, it would be neat if baseball served up posts from all communities that they choose to associate with. Otherwise I would never know that there’s a sports-only instance out there that also has a huge baseball following.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be nice if a moderator could set a community/magazine’s to also display threads from other trusted communities on different instances

        • hutchmcnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is exactly what I mean. Decentralization requires better tools to bring content to the users. Having to manually search is not going to help lemmy get the critical mass it needs.

          • wjrii@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Honestly, some of this can be kludged by mods working together, or at least not guarding their turf too jealously. Simply putting the other communities in the sidebar could be a start. We don’t HAVE to wait for an algorithm to share knowledge, or let the lack of perfect tools be the enemy of good

            ones.

      • habanhero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you saying that if you are subscribed to a Baseball community, Lemmy should sub you to all the baseball related communities whether you consented to it or not? Is that really a good idea? And kinda sounds like you want an “algorithm” to make decisions for you.

        And if you search for a “baseball” community you should see the all relevant major communities across federated instances come up anyways, so I don’t think there is a problem there.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tbh I do want an algorithm to make decisions for me. It’s something I’m missing a ton from Reddit/Twitter.

          Discoverability is shit on this site. It’s like that because there’s no other option in the current system, but I fully believe federation won’t ever take off mainstream because it’s decentralized.

          • habanhero@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            100% agree discoverability can be improved but I think algorithms are basically the antithesis of the Fediverse.

            And it’s totally okay if Lemmy or other Fediverse apps never takes the “mainstream”. I’m totally onboard with it not going down the road of Reddit.

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This wouldn’t be an algorithm. This would be the moderators of ‘tadpoles’ on someinstance.social deciding they would also like to display content from ‘tadpoles’ on someotherinstance.xyz

              • habanhero@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m speaking for myself but I’m not sure if I want moderators making that decision. What you are suggesting is moderators will decide if you as an user should see content from another community, whether you asked to or not.

                I mean if I want to see both subs I would just sub to both. I would not want moderators or algorithms making that decision for me, at all.

        • hutchmcnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then provide an ability to consent.

          My point is that there could be a nearly identical community elsewhere that I would never know about unless the community I’m subscribed to straight up tells me it exists.

          Early Lemmy adopters seem to think that being hard to use is a good thing. The algorithm boogeyman isn’t going to get you if there’s a way to subscribe to baseball@* with a blacklist.

          • habanhero@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If it’s nearly identical then why does it matter which one you sub to?

            Being hard to use isn’t a good thing but also isn’t always a “bug”. Some of the Fediverse behaviors are by design as an antithesis to bigcorp centralization like Reddit - the point IS to have that level of autonomy and separation (instances and individualized communities).

            I get that what you described isn’t exactly an argument FOR centralization but my point is it’s not as big as an issue and it will probably shake itself out. You might argue that it’s a huge blocker for Lemmy to go mainstream, but that’s not the point.

            • hutchmcnugget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you’re looking at pictures of cats, it’s not a big deal. If you’re asking for support with a niche operating system, it’s nice to know that what you’re looking at is the entirety of Lemmy’s resources without having to manually check that a new community popped up or federated in. Which is something that’s happening a lot as Lemmy gets more popular.

              It’s sounds like we disagree on the benefits of decentralized communities. And I do understand your thoughts, I just think that the tools for finding content should be more automated to get the full benefit.

              Have a good one