• Toes♀@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s a huge deal breaker. If that’s not resolved by launch they should be ashamed to put their name behind it.

      • teawrecks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good.

        If the product doesn’t fit your needs, don’t buy it. But we’re not going to get a completely open source laptop that competes with mass market options at the same price over night.

        • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s not really a relevant argument here. One of the massive benefits of RISC-V is the lack of proprietary instruction sets.

          • teawrecks
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            But we’re talking about the supply chain for a GPU that is compatible with this new RISC-V main board that is also good enough to compete with another laptop at the same price point (looks like it’s an IMG BXE-2-32).

            That’s what I’m saying, we’re on the right path, but we’re not going to get there over night. If you want a working viable daily driver today, there are some compromises that have to be made still.

    • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are there any companies making discrete laptop graphics that don’t have proprietary drivers? I don’t think I’ve ever seen an AMD powered laptop unless it used an APU. I shudder to think of what proprietary Linux drivers from a company less resourced than Nvidia are like.