A team of researchers, including Binghamton psychology professor Richard Mattson and graduate student Michael Shaw asked men between the ages of 18–25 to respond to hypothetical sexual hookup situations in which a woman responds passively to a sexual advance, meaning the woman does not express any overt verbal or behavioral response to indicate consent to increase the level of physical intimacy. The team then surveyed how consensual each man perceived the situation to be, as well as how he would likely behave.

The work is published in the journal Sex Roles.

“A passive response to a sexual advance is a normative indicator of consent, but also might reflect distress or fear, and whether men are able to differentiate between the two during a hookup was important to explore,” said Mattson.

The team found that men varied in their perception of passive responses in terms of consent and that the level of perceived consent was strongly linked to an increased likelihood of continuing or advancing sexual behavior.

“The biggest takeaway is that men differed in how they interpreted an ambiguous female response to their sexual advances with respect to their perception of consent, which in turn influenced their sexual decisions,” said Mattson.

“But certain types of men (e.g., those high in toxic masculine traits) tended to view situations as more consensual and reported that they would escalate the level of sexual intimacy regardless of whether or not they thought it was consensual.”

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your daily reminder that “toxic masculinity” was a term coined by men sick of the negative mental health effects on having to conform to aggressive and dominate stereotypes.

    Ya know, in case you think some other gender came up with it.

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Correct, now its mostly used as a lighting rod strawman that defensive insecure men attack while ironically complaining about how poor men’s mental health is.

        Which is exactly what the 60’s men liberation movement was trying to avoid.

        • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          It gets thrown around by liberals plenty of times in order to simplify complicated gender issues. I try to be a better person, but the more I try the more I feel everything I do is wrong. I did not feel that why when I was more conservative.

    • Surreal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      Correct. I lack those “toxic masculinity” and dating life is so hard for me. What they called “toxic masculinity” is what women seek.

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s not true, but I’ve gone round and round with these black pill talking points enough to know that there isn’t anything I could say to change your mind, at least not here in this thread.

        I implore you to seek out new content and to shut off whatever incel sources that told you this. It’s not some harsh but true reality that most people are too PC to say out loud, but a defensive mechanism to blame women for your loneliness. And tragically one that women rightfully see as 🚩 's and stay away from.

        This lonely angry ideology is a self fulfilling prophecy and I can only hope that one day you understand that.

      • Cybermonk_Taiji@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Hey look! Incel logic in the wild!

        Tell us oh incel guru, what is that “the women seek”?

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I ask you to recognize that “women” are as diverse as humanity as a whole.

        Saying that all women are equal or want the same stuff, is like saying, all humans want the same stuff. Which just isn’t true. Maybe you should consider that doing statistics like “most women want that” is not going to give you a full picture of the situation.

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Cymraeg
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Toxic masculinity isn’t necessarily the “masculine” traits themselves. You can have traits which are considered masculine, and those traits not be toxic. Toxic masculinity has more to do with the expectations of traits/gender norms rather than the idealized traits. A trait (or lack of a trait) might make people in a patriarchial society see you as more or less of a man, and that expectation is the toxic masculinity.

        Basically the toxic masculinity is just how society rewards or punishes you for what degree you meet certain normative male/masculine gender roles.

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have a lot of compassion for people who have been poisoned with toxic masculinity. The toxicity comes from a place quite abusive to men. It demands a vision of a man who is what I think of as emotionally castrated. Completely denied any exhibitions of passive sadness, outward facing compassion, grief, fear or desire for anything outside a small range of approved desires. In return they are given tools of violence, silence, denial and anger to express virtually everything. To ask for help is framed as failure. The people whom they love have to interpret their sense of love and compassion only through grandiose acts or through that narrow conduit of allowed emotional reactions… But it is so hard to connect with someone through the medium of anger.

          When people are told “suck it up! Be a man!” it make those things aspirational… But it’s just the sugar around the outside of the conditioning. The inside is bitter isolation. I will always remember my Mom telling me that my Dad was so scared to have sons. He didn’t think he could do right by sons. He struggled so hard with his own conditioning but it never suited him. It never suited my grandfather to whom my Dad always felt like he communicated with always at a distance, the mask only cracking when he was sick in hospital and my Granddad never left his bedside. A deep reservoir of feeling that could never be expressed except in silence between men except under extremes. A strict taboo of self denial… For what?

          Undoing that damage is so hard even when you are aware of it. The toxicity can’t always be healed and some of that damage is permanent.