• grue@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll repeat the comment I made in that thread:

    Unironically, I support completely ceasing all road construction (even “just” repaving, let alone widening) until every street has been brought up to “complete streets” standard with proper sidewalks and bike lanes. Car drivers do not deserve more spending until cyclists and pedestrians are made first-class citizens!

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      start taxing trucks proportional to the wear they cause on public roads. doing so will supplement funding for repairing said roads as well as to encourage rail hauling instead of dangerous hulking vehicles on the same roads we have to commute on.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The larger vehicles tend to get worse mileage and thus pay more taxes on gasoline/diesel that are used for roads without the government needing to track mileage.

        Electric cars, which are heavier than comparable ICE cars, throw a wrench in the fuel paying for roads concept.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, but the increase in fuel cost per unit mass is not proportional to the increase in road wear, which is exponential and absolutely massive in commercial use. Hugely important fact that plays into my opinion that vehicle size should be taxed.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I didn’t say it was a perfect system, just that the system does collect more taxes on heavier vehicles already.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      While this is a nice thought in theory, it breaks down as soon as you start actually thinking of it in practical terms.

      • Some rural road that gets a few cars a day at best does not really need sidewalks and certainly does not need bike lanes.
      • A road with potholes is more dangerous to pedestrians and bikers due to the potential for cars to lose control, or for drivers to swerve to miss a pothole and potentially endanger other travelers.
      • Adding bike lanes and sidewalks is just impractical in a lot of areas. Where is that space coming from, when private property extends to the road edge currently? Are we just declaring eminent domain and taking 3-6 feet of everyone’s property frontage for this initiative? I’m sure that will be a very unpopular initiative. What about areas where buildings are too close to the street to allow for this? There’s just too many areas where it’s not practical or possible to do.

      I’m all for phasing out cars in areas where it’s reasonable to do so, but your proposal just isn’t compatible with reality.

      • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Where is that space coming from?

        You can literally add separated light rail in the center and bike lanes next to the sidewalk and there would still be two car lanes left, one for each direction.

        What about areas where buildings are too close to the street to allow this?

        This street is too narrow to add a dedicated sidewalk, right?

        Which is why the blue square sign is there: The speed limit on this street is walking pace and pedestrians have priority on the entire road.

        Therefore: Put bicycle lanes wherever possible, reduce the speed limit where it isn’t.

      • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        However, we could apply the idea to just roads that are compatible with bike lanes and pathways. It would be a start. I agree that priority needs to be given to safety first but even with that, the next priority needs to be anything but cars where possible.