I found an interesting article (the link) that pescatarianism is not a superior solution to the meat eating problem. What are your thoughts?

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think this article is conflating all fish and measuring them against a specific type of land animals.

    Just like on land, there’s a big difference in sustainability depending on the type of fish you are consuming. Measuring a salmon vs chicken isn’t really an academically honest measurement. When looking at salmon, which takes a long time to mature. We should be comparing it to something more like beef, which also takes more time and resources to manage.

    When comparing something like a chicken which takes a relatively low amount of time and resources to produce. We should be comparing it to something unlike Mackerel, which are significantly more sustainable and less resource intensive compared to salmon.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    To each their own. I know a couple of pescatarians and neither one of them shared an opinion about my diet uninvited so I have no problem with them.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve never met one IRL or online. All I know is they eat fish and not other meat and I once read it was because they equate fish to being the same as insects and don’t feel pain.

    I don’t know if they actually believe that but that idea is certainly some BS.