• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why? AMD doesn’t make phone chips, yet they’re dominating Intel. Likewise for NVIDIA, who is at the top of the chip maker list.

    The problem isn’t what market segments they’re in, the problem is that they’re not dominant in any of them. AMD is better at high end gaming (X3D chips especially), workstations (Threadripper), and high performance servers (Epyc), and they’re even better in some cases with power efficiency. Intel is better at the low end generally, by that’s not a big market, and it’s shrinking (e.g. people moving to ARM). AMD has been chipping away at those, one market segment at a time.

    Intel entering phones will end up the same way as them entering GPUs, they’ll have to target the low end of the market to get traction, and they’re going to have a lot of trouble challenging the big players. Also, x86 isn’t a good fit there, so they’ll also need to break into the ARM market a well.

    No, what they need is to execute well in the spaces they’re already in.

    • Jesus_666@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      When AMD introduced the first Epyc, they marketed it with the slogan: “Nobody ever got fired for buying Intel. Until now.”

      And they lived up to the boast. The Zen architecture was just that good and they’ve been improving on it ever since. Meanwhile the technology everyone assumed Intel had stored up their sleeve turned out to be underwhelming. It’s almost as bad as IA-64 vs. AMD64 and at least Intel managed to recover from that one fairly quickly.

      They really need to come to with another Core if they want to stay relevant.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Actually, AMD do make phone chips. That is, they design the Exynos GPUs, which are inside some Samsung devices

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, and 5 years ago, they had very little of it. I’m talking about the trajectory, and AMD seems to be getting the lion’s share of new sales.

        • sfantu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I hope for the best for AMD … they make great products… I own several AMD machines.

          But ARM and the trust built around it … continues to eat their market … I see Intel as having more of a fighting chance.

          IF THEY RESTRUCTURE … or whatever the fuck their strategy is.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t really see ARM as having an inherent advantage. The main reason Apple’s ARM chips are eating x86’s lunch is because Apple has purchased a lot of capacity on the next generation nodes (e.g. 3nm), while x86 chips tend to ship on older nodes (e.g. 5nm). Even so, AMD’s cores aren’t really that far behind Apple’s, so I think the node advantage is the main indicator here.

            That said, the main advantage ARM has is that it’s relatively easy to license it to make your own chips and not involve one of the bigger CPU manufacturers. Apple has their own, Amazon has theirs, and the various phone manufacturers have their own as well. I don’t think Intel would have a decisive advantage there, since companies tend to go with ARM to save on costs, and I don’t think Intel wants to be in another price war.

            That’s why I think Intel should leverage what they’re good at. Make better x86 chips, using external fabs if necessary. Intel should have an inherent advantage in power and performance since they use monolithic designs, but those designs cost more than AMD’s chiplet design. Intel should be the premium brand here, with AMD trailing behind, but their fab limitations are causing them to trail behind and jack up clock speeds (and thus kill their power efficiency) to stay competitive.

            In short, I really don’t think ARM is the right move right now, unless it’s selling capacity at their fabs. What they need is a really compelling product, and they haven’t really delivered one recently…

            • sfantu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Lol

              The intel atom had a 4w tdp … a snapdragon 855 has 5 w tdp …

              Intel is out of the smartphone market because Google built and optimized…( not as much as Apple ) … android for the arm shit.

              This fucked everyone and helped android… since now we are dependent on the chip vendors . Android can’t be replaced on the damned things … and every 3 years you ha e to buy another piece of crap.