• quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 个月前

    The study primarily focused on white-Black segregation, the groups that the Brown decision addressed, but found that white-Hispanic and white-Asian segregation both also more than doubled since the late 1980s in the large school districts.

    What? You can be white and hispanic. You can be anything and hispanic.

    And grammatically, “white-Black” is an abomination. Capitalize both or neither (preferably neither).

      • quindraco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        No it isn’t, and claiming it is is racist af.

        EDIT: The number of racists who aren’t aware Africa exists and are downvoting me accordingly is hilarious. Please, continue to demonstrate your unfathomable ignorance.

      • quindraco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 个月前

        Exactly. You can be white-hispanic, black-hispanic, mixed race-hispanic. Listing only white-hispanic is bizarre.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 个月前

          Not really? They are highlighting two groups who are significant in the statistical analysis. Why would you list results that aren’t statistically significant?