(x/5)^log_b(5) - (x/6)^log_b(6) = 0

  • siriusmart@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    i get why 0 would work, but i dont get how it doesnt show up as a solution when i try to solve for it

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Expanding on my reply, here’s a different way to continue your own work that would have yielded both solutions, by avoiding any steps that divide by x:

      solution

      Starting from the third line of your work:

      (x/5)^ln(5) = (x/6)^ln(6)

      x^ln(5) / 5^ln(5) = x^ln(6) / 6^ln(6) → Distribute exponents

      x^ln(5) * 6^ln(6) - x^ln(6) * 5^ln(5) = 0 → Cross multiply, move terms to one side

      x^ln(5) * (6^ln(6) - x^ln(1.2) * 5^ln(5)) = 0 → Factor out x^ln(5)

      Can set each factor to 0:

      x^ln(5) = 0 yields x = 0

      6^ln(6) - x^ln(1.2) * 5^ln(5) = 0

      6^ln(6) / 5^ln(5) = x^ln(1.2) → Add right term to right side, divide by its coefficient

      (5^(ln(6)/ln(5)))^ln(6) / 5^ln(5) = x^ln(1.2) → Convert numerator of left side to have same base as denominator, using change of base formula: log_5(6) = ln(6)/ln(5)

      5^(ln(6)^2 / ln(5)) / 5^ln(5) = x^ln(1.2) → Simplify exponent of numerator slightly

      5^((ln(6)^2 - ln(5)^2) / ln(5)) = x^ln(1.2) → Combine terms on left side, simplify numerator into a single fraction

      5^((ln(6)+ln(5))(ln(6)-ln(5))/ln(5)) = x^ln(1.2) → Factor exponent numerator as difference of squares

      5^(ln(30)ln(1.2)/ln(5)) = x^ln(1.2) → Simplify sum and difference of logs in left exponent numerator

      30^ln(1.2) = x^ln(1.2) → By change of base formula again, ln(30)/ln(5) = log_5(30), so 5^(ln(30)/ln(5)) = 30

      x = 30

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      In your own work, you divided by x^ln(6) at one point, which would remove any x = 0 solution from your work - before that step x = 0 was still a valid solution to your equations, but after it it wasn’t