• woelkchen@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Their gaming division isn’t a monopoly, but with their parents funding yeah they could be and that’s the problem.

    I agree it’s a problem but without Microsoft being a monopoly in gaming, no watchdog will do anything about it.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The FTC was trying to do something. Than Microsoft convinced them they weren’t going to do X if they sold Y, so they let the cloud gaming go, and then immediately did what they said they wouldn’t.

      If they didn’t lie to the FTC they would have done something about it than and there.

      It’s not a monopoly until it is, and that’s what they are trying to avoid, stuff getting to that point in the first place.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yes, they let the cloud gaming go so the EU wouldn’t deem them a monopoly, they than told the FTC they weren’t going to lay anyone off. And a month later or so they laid off 2000 employees while using the excuse it was happening anyways regardless of the merger.

          What other merger was there you could be confusing this with?

          • _tezz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wasn’t confusing any merger, I was wondering what action specifically you were referring to is all. There were a few different points the FTC was concerned with in that case.