fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agoTouchymander.xyzimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1459arrow-down19
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageTouchymander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-square5765313496@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70·8 months agoI was going to complain about those numbers not being linear… but they are in a line, so I must be mistaken.
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agoMaybe it’s some kind of famous sequence?
minus-squareChestnut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·8 months agohttps://oeis.org/search?q=3%2C6%2C15%2C24%2C44%2C60&language=english&go=Search I got nothing
minus-squarelemmyng@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·8 months agoBeat me to it by that much 🤏
minus-squarelemmyng@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agoIf it’s not in OEIS it’s not famous.
minus-squarezero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoIt’s the scores from Tennis 2. Original Tennis just didn’t have a weird enough progression.
I was going to complain about those numbers not being linear… but they are in a line, so I must be mistaken.
Maybe it’s some kind of famous sequence?
https://oeis.org/search?q=3%2C6%2C15%2C24%2C44%2C60&language=english&go=Search
I got nothing
Beat me to it by that much 🤏
If it’s not in OEIS it’s not famous.
It’s the scores from Tennis 2. Original Tennis just didn’t have a weird enough progression.