• Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not fair the developers take the heat for this. We should learn to find the right people to complain to.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      125
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s why Spitz said to be angry in the Steam reviews instead of their Discord. People mistakenly took it as a dismissive whine, but that was actually a very important comment that I feel many people overlooked. Sony ain’t gonna do anything differently unless there is actual, tangible damage to their brand. That damage doesn’t come from chat rooms, that comes from storefront reviews.

      Keep the bad reviews coming if you want any hope of Sony relenting.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I really hope Steam doesn’t consider this “review bombing” and take down such reviews. The response is entirely justified.

        • 8ender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          52
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good guy Valve appears to be quietly figuring out refunds for folks, even though almost all are above the hours played limit

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            6 months ago

            Reminder that the hours played rule is only a limit for the automated refund system. You can request a refund for a game at any time for any reason. It just has to be manually reviewed and deemed justified by a person.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I wonder if it’s more damage control, why are they allowing games to be sold in markets where the mandatory linking wasn’t possible?

            Steam should know this limitations, the devs knew about the requirements from Sony, it was listed on the store page since it was listed.

            • fluckx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              6 months ago

              Apparently they recently updated the store to no longer sell in unavailable psn regions.

            • Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Its probably BOTH damage control AND Valve being staffed by PC nerds who ALSO dont want toxic console BS infecting the PC Sphere

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          66
          ·
          6 months ago

          Every single one of those reviews missed multiple warnings about the required account linking.

          They are false reviews by definition, the store had the requirements listed, and there was a splash screen you had to accept when loading the game.

          Every single one of those reviews is someone who made an uneducated purchase, they shouldn’t be defended for their willful ignorance.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            43
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Steam shouldn’t sell products in a country where you cannot use them

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              45
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You’re absolutely correct, how many of those reviews are pointing the blame correctly? I haven’t seen a single one yelling at Steam or arrowhead for selling the game in these markets that wouldn’t be able to play the game.

              • tehevilone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                36
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                There’s no way Steam is 100% in charge of what regions a game is available in. The publisher absolutely has a say in where, and if it was available in all regions at the start that was on purpose.

                  • fluckx@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    18
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    The company that published the game likely updated the region it can be sold in. Steam just offers a platform.

                    Steam/valve is literally not to blame at all for any of this. Do you work for epic games or something?

                    I’m all for putting the blame where it needs to be, but you’re just shooting at all parties involved indiscriminately. Like blaming a rental company for a death in a traffic accident because they own the car.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            6 months ago

            Multiple being TWO at most, one nestled in the effectively credits section of the Steam page which almost never contains information pertainant to the purchase of the game, and another nestled in the “Skip over this usually optional content” settings after you have already installed the game. I didnt even know this game was linked to PlayStation in ANY WAY until this whole fiasco. Its only uneducated because it was HIDDEN.

          • misanthropy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m guy buy it just to get a refund just for you

            EULA roofie-ing shouldn’t be defended

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        This isn’t about Sony “relenting”, Arrowhead needs Sony’s PSN support network to deal with support tickets: it’s the whole reason Arrowhead signed up with a publisher instead of self publishing and developing an international workforce of support agents. I hate Sony as much as the next person but let’s be honest, Arrowhead needs Sony and PSN, and it makes sense given they want to spend their time making games rather than getting into being a publisher and help desk.

        Ultimately, Arrowhead should have made it a day one requirement and delisted the game on Steam for every country that lacks PSN support. Instead Arrowhead and Sony decided to let it ride and enjoy the sales and accompanying popularity.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          And now because of that the PSN requirement is a poison pill. If that was a requirement from the get go, I likely would have reluctantly agreed to it. It now being retroactively enforced means if Sony doesnt relent, I and likely a lot of others will abandon the game and do what we can to get a refund, which will end up costing them a lot of money

          • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It was a requirement from the beginning but it was not enforced due to the initial server issues. It was always there…

            Not saying it’s a good thing but a lot of the discourse I see online seems to overlook that crucial detail and imply this was pulled out of the blue with no warning.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      If the high-ups at Arrowhead knew and made that decision anyway, it’s squarely on them, full stop.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Communicate better? Not sell the game in markets where it wouldn’t work. The limitation was something from the get go.

          • fluckx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I can fully understand the agreement between the two parties was “also requires a psn account” while AH being completely unaware that getting a PSN account is so restrictive.

            Sony likely didnt explicitly add that the game cannot be sold in regions where they can’t create an account.

            Edit: or the didn’t explicitly state which regions a psn account CAN be created in.