If your boss told you to do something completely legal (and ethical), and you just went “Mmmm no” you’d find yourself looking for a new job after not too long.
Stop defending this bad behaviour.
And clearly I used the word subordinate because it flowed well with insubordinate.
If the only counter you have is to critic some stylisation of wording, you’ve got no legitimate reason.
The didn’t say no. They have yet to respond, and the president cannot assign a due date. I’m in full support of decriminalization, let alone descheduling. I’m only speaking to an understanding of the situation, not arguing my opinion of marijuana reform.
The President is a leader of the most important team in the nation. We are in stark disagreement if you believe otherwise. If you want to criticize actions, judge the DEA for stalling, or Congress for linking the DEA’s budget to their apprehension records. The President cannot control those things without wrongful termination or an irresponsible Executive Order.
The minute you terminate someone who disagrees with you, you admit to being unable to lead that individual. It erodes at your respect with other team members, and inhibits your growth as a leader.
Failure to act is as much a “no” as them putting it in words.
The minute you terminate someone you can’t control, you admit to being unable to lead that individual. It erodes at your respect with other team members, and inhibits your growth as a leader. It’s simply poor leadership.
That is utter bullshit. The minute you don’t remove a person who’s a problem you show what a poor leader you are.
If you just allow the shit to fester because “I can change him” you’re actively making it worse for everyone else.
I think we’re having two different conversations. I’m taking about addressing a team member that doesn’t agree with your direction. You’re talking about a long-term problem performer that has a proven negative impact on the rest of the team. One of those analogies is accurate in representing the DEA’s behavior, and the other warrants dismissal.
Now suddenly she’s insisting it has to be scheduled 1 even though literal medical experts and the president are telling her to deschedule?
There’s no world where you honestly believe federal agencies should be ran like that, answering to no one and ignoring science for personal beliefs that change without explanation
Congress is the problem with your proposal. Descheduling can be done by an agreement of HHS and the DEA. Congress needs to pass decriminalization for it to get to the president for approval.
Although the President may not unilaterally deschedule or reschedule a controlled substance, he does possess a large degree of indirect influence over scheduling decisions. The President could pursue the appointment of agency officials who favor descheduling, or use executive orders to direct DEA, HHS, and FDA to consider administrative descheduling of marijuana. The notice-and-comment rulemaking process would take time, and would be subject to judicial review if challenged, but could be done consistently with the CSA’s procedural requirements. In the alternative, the President could work with Congress to pursue descheduling through an amendment to the CSA.
The President could pursue the appointment of agency officials who favor descheduling, or use executive orders to direct DEA, HHS, and FDA to consider administrative descheduling of marijuana.
Yes, he could just replace the head of the DEA for non-compliance with his request. No, that’s not good leadership.
Good leadership is letting an insubordinate subordinate continue to defy orders!
If you refer to members of your team as “subordinates,” you’re not a good leader.
It’s not a team, it’s a government.
If your boss told you to do something completely legal (and ethical), and you just went “Mmmm no” you’d find yourself looking for a new job after not too long.
Stop defending this bad behaviour.
And clearly I used the word subordinate because it flowed well with insubordinate.
If the only counter you have is to critic some stylisation of wording, you’ve got no legitimate reason.
The didn’t say no. They have yet to respond, and the president cannot assign a due date. I’m in full support of decriminalization, let alone descheduling. I’m only speaking to an understanding of the situation, not arguing my opinion of marijuana reform.
The President is a leader of the most important team in the nation. We are in stark disagreement if you believe otherwise. If you want to criticize actions, judge the DEA for stalling, or Congress for linking the DEA’s budget to their apprehension records. The President cannot control those things without wrongful termination or an irresponsible Executive Order.
The minute you terminate someone who disagrees with you, you admit to being unable to lead that individual. It erodes at your respect with other team members, and inhibits your growth as a leader.
Failure to act is as much a “no” as them putting it in words.
That is utter bullshit. The minute you don’t remove a person who’s a problem you show what a poor leader you are.
If you just allow the shit to fester because “I can change him” you’re actively making it worse for everyone else.
I think we’re having two different conversations. I’m taking about addressing a team member that doesn’t agree with your direction. You’re talking about a long-term problem performer that has a proven negative impact on the rest of the team. One of those analogies is accurate in representing the DEA’s behavior, and the other warrants dismissal.
We are.
I’m talking about actually using your powers to help people by pushing for drug reform that’s been desperately needed for almost a century now.
And you’re talking about irrelevant team leadership nonsense.
deleted by creator
Why not?
It’s what voters want, it’s what health experts say, and it would be a giant economic boom
Like, you realize decriminalization was one of his campaign promises, and then he appointed the current head of the DEA, right?
Did it just not come up at all while he was looking at candidates?
BTW:
Did you know she used to be pro medical and wanted people in her state to grow their own?
https://newjersey.news12.com/ag-milgram-backs-medical-marijuana-bill-34885866
Now suddenly she’s insisting it has to be scheduled 1 even though literal medical experts and the president are telling her to deschedule?
There’s no world where you honestly believe federal agencies should be ran like that, answering to no one and ignoring science for personal beliefs that change without explanation
Congress is the problem with your proposal. Descheduling can be done by an agreement of HHS and the DEA. Congress needs to pass decriminalization for it to get to the president for approval.
Nope
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10655
That’s exactly what I wrote. lol
Descheduling is done through HHS and DEA.
Decriminalizing is done through Congress.
We’re done here.