• kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Eh, there’s a lot that could be said about Helldivers, at least as a PC port.

    Great game, nice content delivery, very cool. No DLSS, no modern FSR (it straight up uses an horrendous implementation of FSR 1.0), very bad usage of multiple threads, quite a few bugs - the armour ratings literally did not work, as in, a crucial feature of the game that changes the entire balancing of gear and enemies did not apply, meaning you could have a party of a heavy gear tank and light gear medic and both would take the same damage from the same enemies.

    Again, the game itself is very fun. But I’m absolutely not going to praise this port and claim it’s a shining example of developer quality.

    • ediculous@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Releasing a perfect game that doesn’t have any bugs isn’t what the article is about.

      It’s talking about teams that have honed their craft over many years of developing titles they cared about working on and investing in continuous improvements, of which both Arrowhead and Larian have done.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s true for virtually every game. Diablo IV: hated by many, considered a major downgrade, Blizzard bad, gets boring, doesn’t handle live content updates right… yet go watch the videos with the team that designed the dungeons and the assets, they’re extremely passionate, they are proud of their work, they explain how they spent a looooong time just working on little details they thought people would appreciate.

        It’s super unfair to raise Helldivers and Baldur’s Gate to this elevated “worthy passionate developer” status and disregard others while, at the same time, being selectively blind about the issues both of these games had and still have. In fact, Baldur’s Gate straight up required months of Microsoft intervention to finally (partially!) fix CPU affinity issues.

        • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Most devs are passionate about their work, but the point is that the company around them needs to give them enough time and flexibility to make something great. Diablo 4 didn’t have that, but BG3 did (I can’t speak to helldivers because I haven’t played it enough yet).

        • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Somewhere along the way I lost the verve to argue about this kind of thing. It’s not that I can’t, I just don’t care anymore

          Edit: The guy below me has a valid point. Ignore this comment.