Lugh@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 8 months agoAlthough not peer reviewed or replicated, a NASA veteran claims their Propellantless Propulsion Drive, that physics says shouldn’t work, just produced enough thrust to overcome Earth’s gravitythedebrief.orgexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down135cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.today
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkAlthough not peer reviewed or replicated, a NASA veteran claims their Propellantless Propulsion Drive, that physics says shouldn’t work, just produced enough thrust to overcome Earth’s gravitythedebrief.orgLugh@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.today
minus-squareredfellowlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI’d be willing to bet that the blinding majority does not use it as described, nullifying the premise of your theory. In any case, the more we use it, the less useful it’d be in your alleged use case.
minus-squareOmega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoThe blinding majority have moved on to more modern expressions, it’s just the holdovers who didn’t get the memo and the creeps at this point.
I’d be willing to bet that the blinding majority does not use it as described, nullifying the premise of your theory. In any case, the more we use it, the less useful it’d be in your alleged use case.
The blinding majority have moved on to more modern expressions, it’s just the holdovers who didn’t get the memo and the creeps at this point.