The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not exactly, AI would be able to interpret sensor data in a more complete and thorough way. A person can only take in so much information at once - AI not so limited.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t get me wrong. Humans have many limitations that AI don’t in this scenario. I’m not saying that a human would do better. For example, as others have stated, an AI doesn’t suffer from G forces like a human does. AI also reads the raw sensor data instead of a screen.

      All I’m saying that this case is not the same as a videogame.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Video games can model point of view and limit AI to what they can legitimately see, while still taking the governor chip off their aiming and reaction time performance.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ai can balance a physical triple pendulum and move between positions fluidly just using vision alone, a human has no chance at coming close.

            We’re genuinely in the sci-fi robots are better than humans phase of history, by 2030 you’ll be used to seeing impressive things done by robots like dude perfect videos with people setting up crazy challenges like ‘I got my robot to throw THIS egg through THIS obstacle course and you’ll never belive how it did it!’