• JackOfNoTrades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a smart, pragmatic move, to keep on the good side of the world’s most powerful media mogul but it’s infuriating that any politicians are obligated to attend private meetings with him

    • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does that mean? That Labour have to do what Murdoch tells them? Or offer him something?

      I don’t think it’s smart. I think it raises much bigger issues of the influence that bullionaires hold over the (supposedly) democratic political system.