• self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    you’re right

    the other poster was most likely trying to stir up shit given we’re on a federated network (see also their other post), but I have been obsessed with the idea of a federated search engine this weekend

    it’s definitely a worthwhile idea, but anything that does federated indexing will have to deal with moderation and abuse prevention first. those are hard problems in ordinary federated networks, but search engines specifically are targets of hostile SEO and spam in ways that few other systems are. those aren’t insurmountable problems though — just ones that need to be solved before federation is practical.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I dunno. Google is currently overwhelmed by SEO optimized crap (at least I guess so, I stopped using it years ago because of that) and I think a federated system where members have different prioritizations would make SEO optimization very very hard to abuse.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hope so! this is something I’d like to implement, once I’ve got some free deployment resources and time.

    • metaldream
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I wasn’t trying to stir shit up. You still haven’t explained how a federated search sounds like a good idea. Just more jargon about the implementation. Running a search from some guy’s shitty laptop or cheap vm sounds horrendous.

      Again, what is the point? Do you expect every instance to give different search results or specialize in one type of search? Federation made sense for social media, how does it make sense for search?