you trying to defend an indefensible point of view
The fact that “living wage” has yet to be defined by its proponents in a meaningful and concrete way, such that it could realistically even be proposed as a policy, is not even a “point of view”. That’s just a fact.
I simply refuse to even acknowledge your demented talking points because
Please, we both know the real reason. If what I was saying was so clearly false, you’d expose its fallacy instead of making these ridiculous excuses.
You have to understand that nobody gives a shit about you licking the boots of rich assholes.
Stating facts isn’t bootlicking, no matter how much you pretend it is.
But hey, I’ve been wrong before.
It’s seeming more and more like it’s an especially fond hobby of yours.
I did already tell you that’s not my aim here. I live somewhere with those concrete policies already, so it can’t be impossible. I simply told you you’re an abhorrent person, nothing else. The general sentiment in this thread seems to be in agreement with me.
This also has the added benefit of wasting your time.
Who’s the one with the lacking reading comprehension, again?
The fact that “living wage” has yet to be defined by its proponents in a meaningful and concrete way, such that it could realistically even be proposed as a policy, is not even a “point of view”. That’s just a fact.
Please, we both know the real reason. If what I was saying was so clearly false, you’d expose its fallacy instead of making these ridiculous excuses.
Stating facts isn’t bootlicking, no matter how much you pretend it is.
It’s seeming more and more like it’s an especially fond hobby of yours.
I did already tell you that’s not my aim here. I live somewhere with those concrete policies already, so it can’t be impossible. I simply told you you’re an abhorrent person, nothing else. The general sentiment in this thread seems to be in agreement with me.
This also has the added benefit of wasting your time.
Who’s the one with the lacking reading comprehension, again?