You know who else avoids ever having to change things by saying it’s impossible?
I’ll help you; it’s the ones profiting from the current system and for some reason you’re defending that system and the ones that perpetuate it.
You questioned my reading comprehension several times and I’d dare say that qualifies as a personal attack. The problem isn’t my comprehension, it’s your half-assed rhetoric.
You know who else avoids ever having to change things by saying it’s impossible?
What an idiotic sentence to say to someone who literally never said anything was impossible.
You questioned my reading comprehension several times and I’d dare say that qualifies as a personal attack.
When you respond to a statement in a way that makes it clear you did not at all understand what you read, pointing out the lack of reading comprehension is stating a fact, not an insult.
The above is another perfect example. You want to compare me to someone else, as having “avoids ever having to change things by saying it’s impossible” in common, when I literally never said anything was impossible.
If you are reading things that are literally not there, that is a lack of reading comprehension. It’s no more of a “personal attack” to point that out, than it is to say that someone who just finished saying 2 + 2 = 5, is bad at math.
Ironically, I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt. I could argue that you’re deliberately and maliciously putting words in my mouth, instead of genuinely not understanding what I wrote. Accusing you of being dishonest in that way, now that would be a personal attack.
If your logic was sound, which it isn’t, understanding something would be the same thing as agreeing with it.
I understand your text, I just don’t agree with the underlying motion. I don’t understand how or why a functional adult would have your opinions.
Maybe you’re young and/or delusional, maybe you’re some sort of bad actor or perhaps you just don’t give a shit about other people. Whichever it is it’s coming through pretty blatantly.
As other people pointed out, you’re taking the “politically correct” way, but it still leads to the same endgame.
You know who else avoids ever having to change things by saying it’s impossible?
I’ll help you; it’s the ones profiting from the current system and for some reason you’re defending that system and the ones that perpetuate it.
You questioned my reading comprehension several times and I’d dare say that qualifies as a personal attack. The problem isn’t my comprehension, it’s your half-assed rhetoric.
What an idiotic sentence to say to someone who literally never said anything was impossible.
When you respond to a statement in a way that makes it clear you did not at all understand what you read, pointing out the lack of reading comprehension is stating a fact, not an insult.
The above is another perfect example. You want to compare me to someone else, as having “avoids ever having to change things by saying it’s impossible” in common, when I literally never said anything was impossible.
If you are reading things that are literally not there, that is a lack of reading comprehension. It’s no more of a “personal attack” to point that out, than it is to say that someone who just finished saying 2 + 2 = 5, is bad at math.
Ironically, I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt. I could argue that you’re deliberately and maliciously putting words in my mouth, instead of genuinely not understanding what I wrote. Accusing you of being dishonest in that way, now that would be a personal attack.
If your logic was sound, which it isn’t, understanding something would be the same thing as agreeing with it.
I understand your text, I just don’t agree with the underlying motion. I don’t understand how or why a functional adult would have your opinions.
Maybe you’re young and/or delusional, maybe you’re some sort of bad actor or perhaps you just don’t give a shit about other people. Whichever it is it’s coming through pretty blatantly.
As other people pointed out, you’re taking the “politically correct” way, but it still leads to the same endgame.
Word salad, and you still can’t define “living wage”. Enjoy the impossible errand of enacting a change you can’t even articulate, I guess.
I never said I had any plans to implement any of this. I just wanted to call you out on your bullshit.
So it’s just impotent whining for no reason, then? lol
You can’t even identify a single thing I said that is not true, lmao. Nice fantasy world you live in.
I’d argue that you’re the one living in some sort of Rand-esque lala-land.
I mean, it almost sounds like you believe yourself to be some sort of benevolent economic Ubermensch or something. It’s quite jarring.
Because I shared a couple of facts that are in common with leading economics experts, and pointed out how empty the logic of other things were?
Talk about having low standards.
Those same “economic experts” that, again, perpetuate the late stage capitalism bullshit we apparently can’t do without, because reasons?
Yeah, I bet you agree with those. No doubt.
Do you have a single original thought in your head, or is it all just demented talking points?