• thann@gtio.ioOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you stab your partner in the back and take his half, some could say you were “smarter” than him, but I dont see that as “being smart” I see it as being “ruthless”. You could define who ever wins the backstabbing contest as “the smartest”, but its not always a strategical win like in a game of chess, but rather who was the best liar.

    My main argument is that most people conflate being a psychopath with being intelligent because they’re successful. I assert If these successful psychopaths took intelligence tests with the people they stabbed in the back, they would not always be the smartest.

      • thann@gtio.ioOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        which I agree with. I’m just pointing out that you could define intelligence as “being good at capitalism”, and arguing that its really the same as “being good at deceiving people”, and suggesting its different than intelligence, or that intelligence is a broader term.

        • ricketson@gtio.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ok. This post is confusing. Since you made the post, I thought that the title was your assertion “Capitalism Favors Intelligence”, but it seems like you actually reject that assertion.