Didn’t something similar happen in some US state? They had a buyback, but the wording meant (from poor memory…) people could 3D print an “upper”(??) or some other single part which was considered a “gun”?
This has nothing to do with 3D printing and everything to do with the government being incompetent when it comes to gun control (which is par for the course)
Didn’t something similar happen in some US state? They had a buyback, but the wording meant (from poor memory…) people could 3D print an “upper”(??) or some other single part which was considered a “gun”?
It might be this, or another time I am recalling
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/11/new-york-gun-buyback-rules-3d-printed-parts
This has nothing to do with 3D printing and everything to do with the government being incompetent when it comes to gun control (which is par for the course)