• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You seem to think workers got shafted because something bad happened to the world economy. It’s the opposite, rising Asian economies pulled billions of people out of poverty and they competed with the American worker. It’s because the world economies caught up that the average worker had to get more education to keep up

    • Nevoic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did you read my message? I literally said workers got shafted despite nothing bad happening to the world. That’s precisely the problem.

      It’s fine for the economy to decline in response to negative material realities, e.g a hurricane wiping out a city, the local economy being a reflection of that physical tragedy makes sense, in some regard.

      The problem is we took half a century to recover from literally nothing devastating on a materialist level, it was specifically regulations being laxed and allowing the natural tendencies of capitalism to flourish. This was always the goal of capitalists, they just emitted enough propaganda and exerted enough influence to finally get what they want. Having a class constantly trying to extract as much from workers as possible, and literally succeeding for so long, is a problem that needs to be solved. That class needs to be eradicated.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The money went to foreign workers and decreasing the be female wage gap. It’s not like there wasn’t a reason for it