Let’s reinvent java bytecode but… different

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think having null is great in some cases where you need to represent missing value. It’s just that there’s no good way to know for sure if you need to do null checks or not. The only way around it is to do null checks everywhere, which no one wants to do because fuck that. Nowadays there’s Optional which solves some of this, but it was introduced way too late.

    If I were to redesign Java the first thing I would do is to add a nullable keyword or something.

    • hydroptic
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think having null is great in some cases where you need to represent missing value.

      Option types or sum types would probably be a much less terrible choice for this, although I guess some sort of nullable keyword counts as a sum type

      • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Well, anything that can be captured at compile time or by the IDE is infinitely better than the situation we have today.

        • hydroptic
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ha yeah, just about anything is better than the current status quo