• vesuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well because the wind farms are destroying Sami land? And other alternative placements exist for the wind farms, but not for the reindeer the Sami hunt. Agree or not, but it’s not because she’s protesting the concept of wind farms in Norway.

    • RustyWizard@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be more blunt, the comment was an outright mischaracterization, and if not out of ignorance, then a pure lie. Typical bullshit used to discredit people offhand.

        • RustyWizard@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here in assuming you’re asking that question honestly and not trying to start a debate about whether or not this dishonest nature of the comment constitutes a lie.

          So why was she protesting the building of a wind farm a few weeks ago?

          I find it funny how her protesting something hugely beneficial was met with general silence.

          The comment is set up to try and make Greta appear hypocritical. She’s supposed to be an environmentalist and she’s protesting wind farms? The comment goes on to extrapolate that to the entire environmentalist community being hypocrites because the protest “was met with general silence”.

          What it leaves out is the context of the protest, which had absolutely nothing to do with the windmill, but rather the development of land use by peoples who don’t have the political power to prevent it.

          It’s akin to you protesting a children’s hospital being put in your backyard and then being accused of hating sick children.

          In other comments, OP says “I work in the industry and windmills aren’t a problem”, blah, blah, blah. This purposely misses the point that the problem is development of these people’s land against their will, whether it be a windmill or a Walmart. You can be an environmentalist who is pro windfarm and still have an issue with exploiting people, even if that exploitation is to put up wind farms.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      How are wind farms “destroying Sami land”? Please fill me in.
      Full disclosure, I work in the industry so I would LOVE to know how a wind turbine tower which at it’s base is typically no more than 5 m in diameter (15’) is destroying anything when wind farms are commonly installed on farm land with essentially no disruption to the field and it’s use to grow food.

      • axexrx@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is just a guess, but could the vibrations / low frequency sound be bad for / drive away animals they hunt? I know my community has rebuffed attempts at an offshore one for those reasons and the effect on our fisheries. (I understand sound propagation through water is quite a different beast, but thats my conjecture)

        • FlyingPiisami
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just pointing out that reindeer aren’t really hunted, they’re more like free roaming cattle. They’re all owned by someone.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t mean to be a dick, but if everybody’s gonna make changes could these Sami folks eat something else?