• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      221·
      1 year ago

      Arbitrarily blocking an actor at the protocol level is directly contrary to the entire point of decentralized protocols in the first place.

      I know, Meta bad, but the fact of the matter is that they probably won’t be defederated by everyone, actually, because the idea of being able interact with your real friends and family and other people you know is going to be enticing.

      • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
        131·
        1 year ago

        I want their products to fail so miserably that they regret coming here, and if i have to host several bot instances to spam the worst shit imaginable on their shitty platform. I don’t want Facebook to be a part of the internet in the future, they can go bankrupt. They don’t deserve the internet.

        I know there won’t be a Meta filter in activityhub, its just a wish.

    • Reclipse@lemdro.idEnglish
      8·
      1 year ago

      They should put a hard-coded Meta blocker into activityhub

      That will never happen

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      English
      57·
      1 year ago

      Not really, censorship isn’t the solution.

      Edit: I just woke up when I wrote the original comment and I can see that it’s not the clearest piece of text I’ve ever produced. What I meant is that I fully agree with defederating (and I’ll do it on my instance), but I don’t think censoring Meta in the core technology (ActivityPub) is the way to go.

      • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
        4·
        1 year ago

        Its not censorship and its not up to you, the instances are run by private people, they can defederate whatever they want. If you don’t like it use their “service” problem is that due to federation its very problematic to forward data to Facebook, especially for European Servers.