• Sodis@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    CRISPR is actually much cheaper than the methods used now, so there could be more participants in the market.

    • 342345@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s about the creation of artifical markets - Allowing patents on genetic modifications in lifeforms so that one can sell something that basically copies itself if you provide it with a place to grow (exclusively) and some water and light. It’s highly problematic.

      It’s uncritical to play that utilisation rights game with music and videos and other works of art. No one starves to death from not listening to music. But you shouldn’t play that game with food sources.

      • Sodis@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Which is more of a problem with the expensive methods, that are used right now. With CRISPR there would be a market for other viable mutations, which are not patented.

        • 342345@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You mean garage generical engineering? Genetical design instead of breeding and selection?

          I see pros and cons.