More “fed up” Republicans may leave before the election in hopes of cashing in on the private sector, reporter says

More House Republicans may quit before the end of their terms, which could potentially allow Democrats to regain control of the chamber before the elections.

The early departures of Reps. Ken Buck, R-Colo., and Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., dropped the Republican majority’s margin to just one vote. Gallagher’s planned departure on April 19 is immediately after a date that would trigger a special election to fill his seat, meaning it is expected to stay empty until in the election.

But “other Republicans are angling to get out as soon as they can,” Fox News’ Chad Pergram reported. “A big payday in the private sector could lure some members to cash in their voting card early.”

Pergram reported that some House Republicans are “fed up” and “just exasperated.”

  • supersquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yeah but Democrats probably wouldn’t actually capitalize on this like they could, the Democrat elected would just function as a Republican and Democrat politicians will be like “ha, see we showed them!”.

    • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah but can you honestly say low information voters like you wouldn’t think that no matter what they actually did?

      • supersquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As a leftist? No, I have been waiting for democrats to actually wield power for most of my life instead of managing a conservative status quo, I would immediately notice that kind of change.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah but Democrats probably wouldn’t actually capitalize on this like they could, the Democrat elected would just function as a Republican and Democrat politicians will be like “ha, see we showed them!”.

      Almost assuredly, but it would also be ‘kicking the anthill’ a bit to the Republicans. The house is all they really have right now (excepting the supreme court), and they’ve had it for a long time. They haven’t done shit with it.

      One thing American voters do understand is that voting is transactional. Its why Trump remains so popular as a political figure, because for better or worse, he delivered for his voters on what they were voting for. The Republicans in the House simply haven’t delivered on shit. This works against them, and taking leadership of the house away from them ‘about now’ going into an election would be basically disastrous for their election hopes. Whats the point of putting Republicans into the House if they don’t do shit with the power you give them.

      And to your other points made for the low/ no information neo-liberal apologists like @stanleytweedle, the Democrats suffer from this same issue in their unwillingness to ever actually do anything with the power they are given. We elect them to govern and they fail to do so. Democrats are even less interested in their own agenda than Republicans, and this is the central issue in why votership is so disenfranchised in the US. So in regards to the House races, its a race to the bottom in terms of worthlessness. Democrats could set up a political dynasty that would last generations (like they did under Roosevelt) if they would just commit to policies that make a direct, tangible, and timely difference in peoples lives (LIKE THEY DID UNDER ROOSEVELT!!). Instead we get the neoliberal worship of technocracy and credentialism. Bruh just give us the fucking healthcare we already pay for.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      the Democrat elected would just function as a Republican

      Since that Democrat would be current House Minority Leader Hakeem “Nancy Pelosi’s even more corrupt and hostile towards the left wing of the party protégé” Jeffries, that isn’t far from literal truth at all.

      • supersquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nancy Pelosi the person who defended the right for senators and their spouses to trade stocks in industries they are involved in crafting legislation for because…… because…… omm……. Freedom! Yeah!