The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

  • Arayvenn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to think the more apparent and devastating outcomes of climate change were bound to hit long after I passed away, but now I’m not so sure. Local storms are becoming more and more serious with every passing year, each summer is less bearable than the last and the nearby forests are burning down for the 2nd summer in a row. We are definitely speedrunning this shit.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of the climate change predictions I’ve heard in my lifetime have talked about stuff that would happen by 2050 or 2100. It’s always been bullshit, just a way of pushing out the consequences beyond a timeframe we can actually conceive of effectively. In reality this shit is already hitting us and accelerating hard.

      • miraclerandy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always thought those predictions were listed as “conservative” so the average is a lot closer but main media outlets pick the fastest out point in the bell curve so it’s not so doomed.

        • wuddupdude@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it’s not bullshit to be conservative with climate models because they are incredibly complex. It’s good practice. However, because of the political climate around climate change, scientists probably er on the side of being extra-conservative, and the models are still dire! So, if the real world trends happen to go outside the bell curve, not in our favor, which keeps happening, we’re fucked.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        2050 is less than 3 decades away. I am sure I will be dead by then, but someone born this millennium should absolutely be alive still. What is infuriating is how little importance many younger people put on this issue.

    • ebfortin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s amazing how the human race realize the shit it put itself in only when it is a fraction of a second from hitting the wall at high speed. It’s like that every single time.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except the impact of climate change isn’t at all like a car crash. In a car crash everything stays fine until it suddenly goes to shit. Which I think is one of the issues why people have such a hard time dealing with it.

        Maybe we should think about it more like a sinking ship. We already got wet feet, which isn’t great but only the start and we really need to start shutting some bulk heads to keep the water from pouring in. And get some Wellies to deal with the water already in. But those won’t help if it keeps on rising.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          On geological time scales, this is very much like your car crash analogy.

          Unfortunately, most people don’t seem to be capable of understanding time at that scale.

        • ironhydroxide@partizle.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rich are on the top decks where the valve controls are, they don’t have wet feet, why should they close the valves?

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Surely even the rich would prefer to be able to go outside without the air being full of smoke, and visit a forest that isn’t dead. But I guess there’s a minority for whom the amount of money next to their name is more important, and they happen to run everything.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to think the more apparent and devastating outcomes of climate change were bound to hit long after I passed away, but now I’m not so sure.

      Too many people thinking like that is exactly why we are where we are today. And why it will continue to get worse.

      Those of us who actually care about the world our children and grandchildren will have to live in have been trying to get some large scale action for decades, and we’re tired of beating our heads against a brick wall.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it doesn’t hit in my lifetime it will be soon after, which is one the reasons I choose to not have kids.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      You constantly hear people say “oh, well we are in a warming cycle, so yeah, of course the Earth is going to get warmer”.
      These are people on the Right who have moved past the point of denying the problem of Climate Change and shifted their argument to admitting it is happening, but not admitting that it is man-made.
      In some ways, they are right - the Earth’s climate IS indeed shifting away from an Ice Age and moving toward a warming period, but what we humans have done is essentially thrown gasoline onto the already burning fire. We are accelerating the problem.

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it’s that acceleration that’s the real problem. If this sort of warming happened over twenty or thirty thousand years, the ecosystem would have a chance to adapt and maybe humanity along with it. A couple hundred years? Nah mate, ecological collapse is going to happen and it’ll probably take us with it.

      • bdiddy@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yah and we were actually headed to a 100,000 year cooling cycle. So even their supposed science is wrong lol.

    • lasagna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the way we tend to think of things as black and white. Someone decided to set some disaster increase threshold for the climate crisis events and called it a day. When it has always been about an increase in frequency and intensity of natural disasters and more, both of which we are already seeing.

    • fidodo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      We were warned. We were told it was a tipping point situation and things would seem ok until they aren’t.