What would be some fact that, while true, could be told in a context or way that is misinfomating or make the other person draw incorrect conclusions?

    • Ram@lemmy.ramram.ink
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have no evidence they’re not. Statistically speaking, as many as 8% of humans are potentially immortal.

      • Kale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s common sense that if aging were solved tomorrow, it would be patented and the wealthiest 3% would enjoy much longer lives, while the working class wouldn’t see much change.

        Incidentally, longer life would allow even more accumulation of money and power, making inequality worse.

        Plus side: billionaires now consider climate change threat #1 and use many more resources to solve it compared to today, rather than only care about the next 40-50 years.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          On the down side, they’d probably solve the climate crisis by spreading vaporised peons in the upper atmosphere to block some of the solar radiation.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, only about 8% of people currently living are immortal, so don’t get your hopes up.

    • Ram@lemmy.ramram.ink
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have no evidence they’re not. Statistically speaking, as many as 8% of humans are potentially immortal.