• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sounds terrible.

      That would be worse than the steam deck, since you’re still making the compromise of a mobile/integrated GPU, and most gaming laptops are larger than their non-gaming counterparts. It’s going to take up 3-4x as much space compared to the Steamdeck.

      I appreciate the idea, but laptops just have a lot of unnecessary components for my use case, making them too large to be practical for the purpose.

      • Belgdore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I only suggested it because I’ve been using an old 15in laptop to stream from my pc. It easily hides behind my tv. And I could fit a bigger one.

        Laptop gpus will give better resolution than a steam deck.

        If you are budget conscious, you can’t always pick up something new that’s exactly fit for purpose. Though I understand that you have a different use case

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Game streaming is not the ideal. My network is certainly up to it, I just don’t prefer it, since it requires that I occupy two systems when I’m playing a game.

          If the Mrs wants to play a game then my system would be busy rendering the game, so I would be unable to use it until she’s done.

          There’s a lot of utility in having another system capable of playing games. Both she and I have gaming capable systems, regardless if they’re a little dated. In optimal conditions we could have both her, a guest and I can play games at the same time, possibly together. Streaming precludes that, since another system will always be occupied while someone is playing a game on the TV.