• Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used it after getting frustrated with the AUR. Never looked back unless the package wasn’t on Flatpak or had an AppImage.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      AUR is for esoteric shit, what were you trying to get on there that had a flatpak lol

      • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You say that but there are people who swear by the AUR for everything because it has everything or they prefer Pacman for everything lol

      • Nailbar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve had about 15% success rate with my attempts at AUR. I don’t have the patience to figure out why things don’t work, I guess. Either ended up with a flatpak, or decided it wasn’t that important to me.

        • Imhotep@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I loved Chaotic-AUR when I was using Arch. No waiting to build AUR packages, you know if it works right away.

          You have to decide if you trust the source. Personally I’m not worried.

          Also if you know how to fix an AUR package you can open a ticket on their github and they will update it immediately most of the time.