Five LA high school students were expelled Friday for the same thing.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Boy creates fake photorealistic porn of a girl and passes it all around school to bully, harass, and encourage them to kill themselves: it’s just like drawing a picture of your date.

        • Baguette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          under a state law passed in 2022 which makes it a felony to share “any altered sexual depiction” of a person without their consent.

          They got charged with sharing photos without the other party’s consent. Lets be honest, sharing nudes without consent has been a rampant problem for a long while, and ai has made it 10 times worse

          • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            and is considered to make someone kill themselves? backed by a new law from 2022?

            you are over your head. and you are terrible for claiming that the boys intention was that the girl kills herself. i think you kind of people are just sick and want others to feel bad.

            anyway, let us look at civilisation: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161118/Aboriginal-erotic-rock-art-proves--28-000-years-ago--men-ONE-thing-minds.html

            from the nonsense i read here i take that making a nakied depiction is a crime. as a european i think it is called art and being a human.

            you on the other hand say that natural behaviour in men is bad. they always did and always will depict what they are interested in.

            the result if this 2022 idiots act will be what? yes…and even dumber society: you paint real human…you go to jail. and we know men wont stop drawing. so they either go to jail…or, hear me out: further perversion of the US culture will happen. dont believe it? got proof! afghan men hardly see women…so female looking boys are forced sexslaves. and murica is smarter? LOL…sure not. you’ll be flooded by more femboys, transmen and so on. merica is nothing but retarded at this point: only extremes matter to them. enjoy your next trump.

            sure by murican standards the cavemen drew the cavewomen so she kills herself - he was just an evil animal not like the superior burgereating war machine. fuck america!

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    9 months ago

    They expel high school students over that? I mean sure, it’s not good. But I believe that since this stuff is so new, teens don’t have a feeling for right and wrong there yet. It’s also different to taking actual nude pictures of people. I would expect schools to give people a talk about this, and maybe educate everyone during sex education about this stuff.

    • Itrytoblenderrender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This comment has a strong “boys will be boys” vibe. Creating and sharing such images can be completely devastating and life changing in a negative way for the victims.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ok, let’s pump the brakes for a sec - I need to clarify something:

      Is it your position that a high schooler using an AI deepfake generator to create a video of a female classmate in what could only be described as hardcore pornography is in any way, shape, or form excusable, defensible, or even slightly morally ambiguous?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unequivocally no, but the punishment should fit the crime.

    • Wet Noodle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Kid is lucky he’s not going to juvenile detention, making and sharing child porn is kinda an extremely serious crime, even if you’re in high school and the cp is ai generated

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        calling out that I’ve read pedos on this site advocating for AI generated content. This is problematic in a lot of ways. Normalizing ai cp, of people you know or not is nasty as fuck.

        This highschool stuff is the next level of problematic because it is based on people in the local system, and is often weaponized.

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The question I have is would they have been arrested, expelled or suspended if there was no AI stuff involved. If they had drawn, painted, 3D rendered, or physically cut and paste pictures would the punishment been as severe? At the very least I would think it’s still harassment and bullying, I’m just trying to figure out if the punishments are getting harsher because the fakes are more realistic.

      Or perhaps we’re only hearing about the AI stuff

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Shut the fuck up. These are hs kids they know better.

      This asshole is the equivalent of the “well what was she wearing?” guy every time trump raped someone.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      While I was initially inclined to agree with you on the argument of “where’s the law, where’s the line” the article is pretty clear there is a law for it where they live.

      On the one hand, yeah, I generally agree that children shouldn’t be arrested for something they’re doing just goofing around (to them it seems like a victimless crime), but on the other hand, it’s a sexual crime against children which I firmly believe should have zero tolerance.

      AI seems to be getting the same “what can you do about it” privilege as guns, which should be the focus.