Zhang, an electrical engineer in Boston, decided to post about trying to unlock his Justice Tech Solutions Securebook 5 on the social platform X. The thread went viral — also catching the attention of Washington corrections officials, who have used the device for college programming since 2020.

Of particular concern was an article about Zhang’s thread published on a hacker website that shared the default password for the underlying software that starts the laptop’s operating system, presenting what the Department of Corrections considered a security concern.

The department then announced Thursday, five days after Zhang’s viral post, that it would collect all secure laptops from incarcerated students statewide “to provide an immediate system update.” By Saturday, corrections staff had collected around 1,200 laptops, spokesperson Chris Wright said in an email.

Wright confirmed no one incarcerated in Washington prisons had attempted to unlock their devices but said the decision was “made out of an abundance of caution.” It wasn’t immediately clear whether other states whose corrections departments use Securebook 5 laptops have also pulled the devices.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/LS3co

e; updated the title due to popular demand

  • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Intentionally inflammatory and misleading headlines on Lemmy? Pshaw. The hell you say.

    • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not a Lemmy issue. Click bait unfortunately works to drive views through all social media platforms.

      The thing I love is being able to click into the comments first to see the auto-generated summary. Prevents the site from getting my traffic.

      • Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The community could make rules on what is acceptable to post or not though. And disallow websites that regularly mislead.

        • Nilz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          And it should require copying the title from the article and not allow editorializing it (or only slightly).

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I never realize what responses like this add to the discussion.

      do you have any other community platform free from clickbaits? do you need a pat on the back cuz you think you’re immune to clickbaits? what’s the point?