• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seriously. There isn’t a single live service thing I enjoy. Windows 11 has a bunch of live service integrations, one of which effectively bricked my gaming laptop because Microsoft can’t be assed to git revert a change to their website. I’m rocking Linux now and not looking back.

      • SteefLem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Live service if done right can work. Problem is these companies do the absolute minimum and that just doesnt work. Like most thing they have to put some effort in it, but hey that costs money and thats a no no So im not necessary against live service but knowing these companies just do fuck all, then well just No

        • Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Let’s call Live Service what it really is, company hosted anti-piracy because they don’t want to pay/implement Denuvo

          • Gamoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s just always online. Live Service is milking customers for more money on top of the already full priced game, because just releasing a product that’s good and is the best selling game of that year wasn’t profitable enough for the vampires at the top of the company.

          • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I put tons of hours into it before they shut it down permanently.

            Which is one of the major problems with Live Service. Sure, not everyone plays older games, but I know I have a number of titles I return to regularly. Hell, one of my favorite games of all times was released in 1989 and I still go back an re-play it from time to time. Any game which releases as “Live Service” and requires an always on-line connection to some server which I don’t host can go eat a bag of dicks.

  • Fubarberry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 months ago

    It bothers me a lot that WB had Hogwarts Legacy (which sold great, out sold Call of Duty, and generally did fantastic) and Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League (which unsold, got bad reviews, and has probably killed it’s development studio) and came to the conclusion that they need to go all in on more games like Suicide Squad.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You heard it here first folks, the guys with the most money have declared taking risks is officially dead. They will only pursue guaranteed profits. They’re so completely addicted to the stuff that they cannot take a paycut or have a bad quarter, even though they will be given Golden Parachutes if the company folds.

    Capitalism has turned into a complete joke with people who literally think they are owed profits by simply existing. It’s similar to the ad industry where they think we owe them viewing their ads because they paid for the ads, and by not viewing them we’re breaking some kind of social contract. Bullshit.

    This is what happens when laborers are alienated from what they produce.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The thing is that they go for this because it does make money. For all the talk about lack of original properties, when original properties are released they don’t do so well. Reminds me of how people bitched at Disney for not releasing original films that aren’t sequels, so they did, and they bombed and nobody paid for them.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s hard for me to think of a company that is public and that I actually care about other than a few indie devs. But once it grows and becomes public it’s all downhill.

  • Lemming421@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    Or, and hear me out, not fucking that. Just give me the next year and let me import the character.

    Or a brand new story in a different time period with a brand new character.

    Want a different coloured hat, or a new type of mount? By all means, have cosmetic paid DLC.

    But the all-in-one single player story was the good bit. Don’t fuck that up for the sequel.

    • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Warner Brothers can’t even run a good business when it comes to movies in the DC universe, so I’m not surprised that can’t run a gaming business either.

      WB is incompetent. Look no further than Arkham Knight which had horrible publishing and whose PC port was farmed out to the lowest bidder. Arkham Knight succeeded despite its publisher and not because of it. Same thing with Hogwarts.

      So yeah if they’ve even forced a studio to make a sequel, buckle up. They’re going full EA at this point and they don’t care if they run it into the ground. Just need a bigger graveyard to put this game next to Henry Cavils Superman.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Live Service? Oh it never works. I mean, these people delude themselves into thinking it might but…

    it might work for us…” -WB, after watching WB’s Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League tank

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Enough people are naive enough to buy into a live service game with a Harry Potter coat of paint. Just look at the first game, a paint by numbers “baby’s first RPG” that made serious bank off of millions of oblivious gamers and transphobes.

  • Aidinthel@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why not make it a full MMO, while you’re at it? Hogwarts Legacy 2 could be the WoW-killer we’ve been waiting 20 years for!

    • CryptidBestiary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Probably because MMO is not the trending buzz word for execs and shareholders. Plus you got an example of a successful live service game (Helldivers 2). Doubtful that these are the type of people to be in touch with what people actually wants

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly that would be kinda cool, and I’m surprised no one’s made a Harry Potter MMO/small-scale multiplayer co-op. It’s a pretty good starting point to have each of the players be students at Hogwarts, attending classes and such together.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    They won’t be thinking it should be a live service when people play the game for maybe 30 minutes then ask for a refund because of low quality.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    And I think every live service is a “no buy”.

    If they don’t want to make money, they should do it and make whatever business goon suggesting it very happy (until that person looks at the balance sheet).

  • Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The depressing thing is a live-service Harry Potter game would probably make WB a ridiculous amount of money. Lock the best brooms and wands behind a paywall, pay real money to buy House points to win the House cup, all sorts of ways to squeeze money out of players.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think Harry Potter has been thoroughly milked. See the last attempt at a movie franchise.

      I played Hogwarts Legacy, it was meh imho. I clearly won’t be playing Hogwarts Legacy II, as it will be a live service game for no good reason.